Negotiators, fueled by a shared commitment to combating climate change, worked tirelessly through the night to forge a new agreement at COP28, indicating the world’s collective aspiration to steer away from fossil fuels in the coming decades. The accord, endorsed by representatives from nearly 200 nations in a public meeting in Dubai, signals a resolute move towards addressing the pressing issue of climate change.
COP28 President Sultan al-Jaber, embodying the spirit of the negotiations, expressed his gratitude moments after the central document received unanimous approval. “From the bottom of my heart, thank you,” al-Jaber declared. “Together, we have confronted realities, and we have set the world in the right direction.”
This agreement distinguishes itself with notably stronger language regarding fossil fuels compared to earlier proposals. For the first time in the text, there is a clear call for “transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner, accelerating action in this critical decade, so as to achieve net zero by 2050 in keeping with the science.”
The groundbreaking nature of this proposal lies in its explicit acknowledgment of the necessity to move away from oil, natural gas, and coal. This marks a historic moment, representing the first time nations at a UN climate summit have collectively recognized the imperative to address fossil fuels and shift towards more sustainable energy sources. John Kerry, U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, commended the strong document, expressing optimism and gratitude for the spirit of cooperation exhibited during the summit.
However, amidst the celebrations, some disappointment lingers. The deal falls short of explicitly calling for a ‘phase-out’ or ‘phase-down’ of fossil fuels, causing a degree of discontent among certain countries and environmental leaders. The absence of these terms, previously hinted at by al-Jaber, introduces a nuanced aspect to the agreement.
The phrasing emphasizes ‘transitioning away’ from fossil fuels, suggesting that countries will strive to reduce production and consumption over the next few decades. However, it leaves the door open for continued use beyond 2050, provided carbon capture facilities and other technologies are employed to prevent the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Environmental experts describe this agreement as a paradox, neither a small step forward nor a giant leap, but somewhere in between. Caroline Brouillette, an environmental campaigner with Climate Action Network Canada, acknowledges the significance of the step forward while highlighting the ongoing influence of the fossil fuel lobby on the proceedings.
As the discussions unfolded in OPEC-territory, the alliance between countries faced with climate effects, such as rising sea levels, raised concerns about potential loopholes in the agreement. While the deal calls for a tripling of global renewable energy capacity and a doubling of energy efficiency by 2030, the absence of a firm ‘phase-out’ commitment has led to varied reactions.
The fund, launched during the conference, aims to assist developing countries in coping with the impacts of climate change. Germany and the host country, the United Arab Emirates, made substantial contributions of $100 million each, with Canada pledging about $12 million.
In the wake of COP28, there is a mix of optimism, gratitude, and acknowledgment of imperfections. While the agreement represents progress, the nuanced language and absence of a firm commitment to phase out fossil fuels entirely have sparked ongoing discussions. As the world grapples with the urgent need for climate action, the COP28 accord sets the stage for further deliberations on the global energy transition and the role of fossil fuels in shaping a sustainable future.
Check out the latest news in our Global News section
Stay updated on environmental data and insights by following KI Data on Twitter